the more I use MiniTest the less I like it
@SharpsawDotOrg @rbates I'd rather have the expressitivity via regular Ruby instead of looking up custom syntax :<
-
-
@bascule@SharpsawDotOrg@rbates What custom syntax? With RSpec, the semantics are so twisted. ↬ Quick, no docs, define a matcher. -
@SharpsawDotOrg@rbates x.should be < 10 versus x.must_be :<, 10 -
-
@SharpsawDotOrg@rbates it lets me use standard Ruby syntax to build my assertion, instead of a special syntax like x.must_be(symbol, num)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.