the more I use MiniTest the less I like it
@rbates I really do like how RSpec makes everything look Englishey. Not really a fan of MiniSpec's shared examples either
-
-
-
@SharpsawDotOrg@rbates I'd rather have the expressitivity via regular Ruby instead of looking up custom syntax :< -
@bascule@SharpsawDotOrg@rbates What custom syntax? With RSpec, the semantics are so twisted. ↬ Quick, no docs, define a matcher. -
@SharpsawDotOrg@rbates x.should be < 10 versus x.must_be :<, 10 -
-
@SharpsawDotOrg@rbates it lets me use standard Ruby syntax to build my assertion, instead of a special syntax like x.must_be(symbol, num)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
-
@botanicus@bascule@rbates It's crazy how powerful it is to be able to *easily* write custom, fluent matchers.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@bascule One of the best features of AppleScript too.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.