@bascule my biggest issue with MiniTest::Spec is that it adds a lot of methods to Object. Feels worse than RSpec in that way.
-
-
-
@rbates must_be :<, 42 makes me feel :< -
@bascule is there something you don’t like about MiniTest besides its spec interface? -
@rbates I really do like how RSpec makes everything look Englishey. Not really a fan of MiniSpec's shared examples either -
-
@SharpsawDotOrg@rbates I'd rather have the expressitivity via regular Ruby instead of looking up custom syntax :< -
@bascule@SharpsawDotOrg@rbates What custom syntax? With RSpec, the semantics are so twisted. ↬ Quick, no docs, define a matcher. -
@SharpsawDotOrg@rbates x.should be < 10 versus x.must_be :<, 10 - 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@bascule versus what? - End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@bascule I'd rather stab my eyeballs with muddy golf tees that had been dipped in dog crap than use MiniTest units. -
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@bascule Duh, it’s minitest, you’re supposed to use *less*, not more!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.