@calavera depends what you are doing with it. what are you doing with it?
-
-
Replying to @bascule1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
-
Replying to @judsonlester
@judsonlester Rubinius is a complex project. Do you have a specific issue? /c@bascule@calavera1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @judsonlester
@judsonlester I've never seen the choice of build system be a criteria for using software. Use RVM? /c@bascule@calavera1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @brixen
@brixen@calavera@judsonlester probably wants 1) versioned releases 2) packages built for multiple Linux distros 3) apt-get/yum install1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bascule
@bascule@brixen@calavera@judsonlester every release has a version! it's a sha-1 version, but it is a version. ;)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @steveklabnik
@steveklabnik@brixen@calavera@judsonlester as a fan of crypto, the output of a hash function isn't a valid version number IMO2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
@steveklabnik @bascule @brixen @calavera @judsonlester version numbers are your stamp of approval rather than a state at a point in time
-
-
Replying to @bascule
@bascule I approve of this (insert git sha here) version. :) /c@steveklabnik@calavera@judsonlester1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @brixen
@brixen@bascule@steveklabnik@calavera@judsonlester if you are going to rely on git SHA1, at least sign your tags.#pgp0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.