@steveklabnik @smerrell Ya needs to be a virtual machine. JVM (ignoring its faults, we can learn from them) has shown to support rich langs
-
-
Replying to @kellabyte
@kellabyte@smerrell we already tried that, and it failed.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
-
Replying to @steveklabnik
@steveklabnik@smerrell That was treated as a plugin. If a virtual machine *was* the standard, the VM is already running when browser opens.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kellabyte
@kellabyte@smerrell yeah maybe! like you said, learn from past failures.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @steveklabnik
@steveklabnik@kellabyte I'm beginning to think the browser as the VM approach is what is going to happen long term. Devs want more than JS2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @smerrell
@smerrell@steveklabnik@kellabyte sadly your best bet will probably remain otherlang->JS translation. What other standard would win?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bascule
@bascule@smerrell@kellabyte like most standards, you’d have to write the code, then write the standard :)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @steveklabnik
@steveklabnik@bascule@kellabyte +1 we just need to write the code and then the standard. It'll kind of suck at first but be good overall1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@smerrell @steveklabnik @kellabyte good luck displacing JS ;) Although with typed arrays you can write your own VM in JS...
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.