@DrPizza @kellabyte InvokeDynamic
-
-
Replying to @bascule
@bascule@kellabyte Does an InvokeDynamic bytecode instruction enable appreciably more performance than DLR code?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DrPizza
@DrPizza@kellabyte InDy provides a declarative way to describe dispatch and (polymorphic) caching semantics for any language to the JVM2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bascule
@bascule@kellabyte right, but the DLR in .NET 4.0 does polymorphic inline caching too, which is why I wonder about the differences.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DrPizza
@DrPizza@kellabyte can the CLR inline e.g. Ruby code? I really doubt it. Take a look at InDy MethodHandles and SwitchPoints3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bascule
@bascule@kellabyte I'm sure there are devils in the details, mind you.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DrPizza
@DrPizza@kellabyte most certainly. Most of the stuff you've see about how Clojure can't benefit from InDy is flat out wrong /cc@headius1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kellabyte
@kellabyte@DrPizza@headius yeah that was a bit of a troll ;)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.