@bascule @kellabyte Does an InvokeDynamic bytecode instruction enable appreciably more performance than DLR code?
-
-
Replying to @DrPizza
@DrPizza@kellabyte InDy provides a declarative way to describe dispatch and (polymorphic) caching semantics for any language to the JVM2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bascule
@bascule@kellabyte right, but the DLR in .NET 4.0 does polymorphic inline caching too, which is why I wonder about the differences.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DrPizza
@DrPizza@kellabyte can the CLR inline e.g. Ruby code? I really doubt it. Take a look at InDy MethodHandles and SwitchPoints3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bascule
@bascule@kellabyte I'm sure there are devils in the details, mind you.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kellabyte
@kellabyte@DrPizza you can mix and match static and dynamic typing with InDy too ;)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bascule1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
-
Replying to @kellabyte
@kellabyte@DrPizza yes, kind of. People have exposed InDy into Java... but it's really just for experimentation1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bascule
@bascule@DrPizza Right, in C# this is built in for several years now. Can also do things like: http://bit.ly/kxH72M2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@kellabyte @DrPizza C# is admittedly a better language than Java, although that's orthogonal to CLR vs. JVM
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.