@raggi @ashedryden @steveklabnik may also be worth noting that in those IR systems, it's not skin color, it's IR reflectiveness...
-
-
Replying to @raggi
@raggi@ashedryden@steveklabnik it's just a high correlation of dark skinned folks who don't have IR reflective cornea2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @raggi
@raggi@ashedryden it’s not racism, it’s correlation!2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @steveklabnik
@steveklabnik it's not racism if it's too expensive to not be, apparently.@raggi1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ashedryden
@ashedryden@steveklabnik that's not what i'm saying. racism suggests belief or intent, neither of which the technology has..1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @raggi
@raggi but the developers,testers, marketers, analysts, etc. do.@steveklabnik1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ashedryden
@ashedryden@steveklabnik maybe i'm not cynical enough to believe that their intent was discriminatory, more accepting of tech shortcomings3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @lindseybieda
@lindseybieda@raggi is it racism if you make a drug that doesn’t work on black people due to e.g. complications with too much melanin?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bascule
@bascule@lindseybieda you're just derailing the conversation bro2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@raggi @lindseybieda given the whopping 0 replies sans yours, I don't think any derailing took place
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.