The new Rovnix downloader uses uncommon evasion tactics and is nearly impossible to detect. Learn more: http://intel.ly/1Ua5SSa
-
-
Replying to @McAfee_Labs
@McAfee_Labs Please list SHA1 hashes rather than MD5. Thanks!1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @bartblaze
@bartblaze@McAfee_Labs Why not SHA256? SHA1 is only used by a small subset of orgs and also has collision issues.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @instacyber
@bartblaze@McAfee_Labs At least MD5 is more succinct when just trying to positively describe a sample.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @instacyber
@instacyber@bartblaze@McAfee_Labs Is there any known MD5 collision with this malware?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @silascutler
@silascutler @instacyber @McAfee_Labs Not that I know of and I doubt it, but you never know.
5:27 AM - 14 Dec 2015
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.