@bartblaze @janl Certainty is fairly high; that's _A LOT_ of audio to send back and centrally process vs. doing it locally
-
-
Replying to @dakami
@dakami@bartblaze they might analyse locally and just send the results back home.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @janl
@janl@bartblaze generally you send back a set of "features" (independent unique fuzzy metrics). The server matches to known content.1 reply 2 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @dakami
@dakami@janl I wonder how big their set of known content is though - maybe@alexstamos has some extra information regarding this feature?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bartblaze
@bartblaze@janl@alexstamos it's probably pretty large; content id databases have been maintained for years and years1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dakami
@bartblaze@janl@alexstamos but it's for copywritten content, not arbitrary speech1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dakami
@dakami@janl@alexstamos Interesting, which kind of copywritten content would that comprise exactly?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bartblaze
@bartblaze@janl@alexstamos basically anything that would make it to the Pirate Bay1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dakami
@dakami@bartblaze@janl@alexstamos I guess it depends if it extract the features in the phone or it sends the raw data to FB servers1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jaimeblascob
@jaimeblascob@bartblaze@janl@alexstamos I'd make a nontrivial bet they're doing feature extraction locally, probably with a common lib1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes
@dakami @jaimeblascob @janl @alexstamos Sounds plausible, thanks all.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.