EA Admits Unjust PunkBuster Bans in Battlefield Games, Investigating the Matter >> http://news.softpedia.com/news/EA-Admits-Unjust-PunkBuster-Bans-in-Battlefield-Games-Investigating-the-Matter-447906.shtml … via @softpediagames
-
-
Replying to @bartblaze
@bartblaze@softpediagames and at the same time there are so many players clearly using aimbots in bf3.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Reversity
@Reversity@softpediagames Sad but true, I've noticed it as well.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bartblaze
@bartblaze@softpediagames interestingly I believe most cheaters could be detected with high accuracy statistically without needing PB.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Reversity
@Reversity Interesting. How would you achieve that exactly?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bartblaze
@bartblaze since i believe the purpose of a hack is to give a statistically significant advantage, it should be statistically detectable.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Reversity
@Reversity Sure, but wouldn't it produce false positives? Back in the days I'd be accused of aimbot pretty much everytime I prefired.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bartblaze
@bartblaze i don't think so. I'd think aimbot are constant stat outliers not just lucky. And I'd think they would have stat fingerprints1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Reversity
@Reversity Aimbots absolutely, as you'll always pop a headshot. What about other cheats though? (ESP, WH, ...)2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bartblaze
@bartblaze but again. Should give a stat advantage. If detected player should be screenshot.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@Reversity Screenshots don't seem like a reliable way to me. I'm not sure how currently cheats work for BF3 though.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.