@TimoHirvonen The real question is what is the overall attack volume 2 weeks from now. There are 60+ other exploit kits to choose from..
-
-
Replying to @TimoHirvonen
@TimoHirvonen How well volume correlates with harm done/monentary losses? In general.@hugbomb1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mikk0j
@mikk0j@TimoHirvonen Good point. That one seems particularly hard to measure accurately though.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @hugbomb
@hugbomb@mikk0j@TimoHirvonen That's as good as unmeasurable, since payloads may differ as well.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bartblaze
@bartblaze@hugbomb@TimoHirvonen So basically statistical analysis on malware quantity/distribution is only near reliable outcome?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mikk0j
@mikk0j@hugbomb@TimoHirvonen I'd think that's your best bet in cases like this one.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bartblaze
@bartblaze@mikk0j@TimoHirvonen Makes me wonder what $_lost _in_breaches vs. $_spent_on_security is. Who's making more money from hacks?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @hugbomb
@hugbomb@mikk0j@TimoHirvonen Great question! It depends not only on budgets, but on $security as well. Physical, training people, ... ?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bartblaze
@bartblaze I wonder how many$s does the sec. industry make for every $ lost to attacks? <1? >1? No axe to grind here, just curious.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.