Well, @Liz_Wheeler, seeing as you’ve decided to pick a fight over English law with an English lawyer, let’s dance.
Start with the basics. Separation of powers:
Executive (government)
Legislative (Parliament)
Judiciary (courts)
All constitutionally separate. With me so far?
-
-
Show this thread
-
Here’s the judgment from the High Court judgment in February. You will note that the UK government is not a party to proceedings. We know that because the name of the relevant government minister (Secretary of State for Health), does not feature. https://www.judiciary.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/alder-hey-v-evans.pdf …pic.twitter.com/IyvkMTz3eT
Show this thread -
Rather, boiling this down to simple concepts that even you can understand, the legal dispute is between the doctors at the hospital and Alfie’s parents as to what is in Alfie’s “best interests”. Stop me if I’m going too quickly for you. I can add illustrations if that helps.
Show this thread -
I won’t repeat the full medical evidence (you can read the judgment for yourself or ask a friend to help), but here is a summary of the uncontested medical conclusions. From doctors. Not anyone in government.pic.twitter.com/dVfqSMRos0
Show this thread -
Here is the relevant legal test as to what constitutes a child’s “best interests”. Please do jump in at any time to explain how, in your medico-legal expertise, the judge and/or experienced doctors have got this wrong.pic.twitter.com/IMEhVCwi3l
Show this thread -
And here are the court’s (*not* the government’s) conclusions. Again, if your training as a lawyer/neurologist/paediatrician/lobotomised Trump fangirl compels you to reach to an alternative informed opinion, we’re all ears.pic.twitter.com/edPY6ofe2J
Show this thread -
Now that, Liz, is the first judgment in the Family Division of the High Court. You will, I presume, have read all of the subsequent judgments as the case progressed through various layers of appeal. Here they are (helpfully collected by
@davidjwood)https://twitter.com/davidjwood/status/986563048671469570?s=21 …Show this thread -
Of particular interest may be the below paragraph from the Court of Appeal’s second judgment. It deals with the “legal advice” given by the Christian Legal Centre and spread across social media, which I suspect informs your opinions. The “advice” was entirely bogus.pic.twitter.com/VDLHLtfBVA
Show this thread -
Other snippets from that judgment. The barrister acting for the parents submitted that the court should *not* consider Alfie’s best interests, but should subjugate them to the wishes of his parents. The court described this as “startling”. That’s judge-speak for “batshit”.pic.twitter.com/7QK8Otdv8D
Show this thread -
Addressing the issue as to whether Alfie should be taken to Italy, the medical evidence was clear. I mean it,
@Liz_Wheeler. Jump in at any point if I’m getting any of this wrong. You, after all, started this by correcting me on how English law works.pic.twitter.com/0KcGfoP2Pd
Show this thread -
You will see, and must retweet to your followers, that the decision was based *entirely* on an assessment of Alfie’s best interests. Not on “cost of treatment”. Nothing to do with “socialised medicine” or “death panels”. Solely what is medically best for a very sick child.
Show this thread -
As I say
@Liz_Wheeler, if you can read the judgments and explain where, medically, the experts are wrong, then you deserve a hearing. If not, your opinion is worthless and you are monstrously self-publicising over a family’s most unimaginable tragedy.Show this thread -
So, to summarise: - Government was not involved at all in the decision. - Decision based solely on assessment of Alfie’s best interests - Medical evidence overwhelming - Christian fundamentalists lying about the law to exploit tragedy. - Twitter idiots fuelling fire.
Show this thread -
If any of that is unclear,
@Liz_Wheeler, please say and I will personally write it out in crayon and have it posted to you. Have a nice day. SBShow this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.