Adam doesn't seek the spotlight, which is why you likely hadn't heard his name until June as the editor who published the Tom Cotton oped. Adam was one of half a dozen editors who worked on that piece. He was the most junior among them. Yet Adam was named by @nytimes.
-
-
Show this thread
-
This piece says that Adam was "thrust into the media spotlight." No. Adam was hung out to dry by his own colleagues. Then he and his work were lied about, including in this mendacious editor's note.https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/03/opinion/tom-cotton-protests-military.html …
Show this thread -
There is a bigger story to be told here, but the bottom line is that what
@nytimes did to Adam was a disgrace. So is the fact that there wasn't a massive and public union campaign to defend him.Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
He Should’ve known that the New York Times is more important and some damn senator. Especially from regions that the paper has institutional hatred for
-
I think you said the quiet part out loud. The NYT staff prefer confirmation bias to diversity of thought.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Rubinstein, Bennet, Berenson, Weiss........ Will the last one to leave please turn out the lights.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I have to be honest, unless
@RubensteinAdam comes forward and speaks out against the culture of suppression of alternative ideas permeating nearly all of American life, then I have little sympathy for him. -
“America should do Tiananmen Massacre in every major city” is quite the “alternative idea”
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I heard they don't like Jews at the NYTimes.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.