Battlefield 5 was marketed using an "I'm touching your stuff" strategy, like a spiteful bratty little brother. It deserved what it got, gamers don't like that kind of sh*t test. And what's wrong with breast sliders, and what does that have to do with "muh representation"?
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
Even simpler. They could have just said it was WW2 themed. That's all it would have taken. But no, they had to go "SHUT UP, COCKNEY CRIPPLE COMMANDO WOMEN WITH TOURETTES ARE TOTES HISTORICAL AND YOU NEED TO READ SOME BOOKS YOU STUPID NERDS!"
Yeah, if they were afraid the WWII formula was getting tired, they should have just made a new title off the same engine... like.. you know... BattleFront. Remember the BattleFronts on original XBox? Everybody liked those.
-
-
I mean, they could also just admit it's not historically accurate, and write that into the story of the game, that it's a "Weird War" genre. Ad some Nazis that turn into werewolves and "witch" is a class on Britain's side.
-
Yeah, "Weird War" would have been fine. Even if it was "Weird Diversity War". Instead they had to act as if their historical retconning was a legit thing to do.
-
Dammit, now I think we got special classes... French have time travelled cyborgs, brits have witches (fly on brooms to scout, can hover for sniping) germans werewolves, Amercians... Cowboys.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.