Conversation

"...the only amount of decentralization people want is the minimum amount required for something to exist..." This is true for the same reason internet apps use the minimum necessary bandwidth to exist. Blockspace, like bandwidth, is rapidly increasing but costly and finite.
Quote Tweet
Wrote some notes summarizing my first impressions of web3: moxie.org/2022/01/07/web
38
823
In 2000, Netflix mailed DVDs. They knew streaming was the future. But they also knew bandwidth was limited. In 2022, many web3 entities are partially centralized. They know decentralization is the future. But blockspace is limited. Need Nielsen's Law for blockspace.
Image
Image
13
455
It's not my goal here to revisit the block size debate — I understand the arguments on both sides — but empirically what happened is that when BTC blocks got to ~1MB, other chains arose to provide demand for blockspace. ETH use started soaring in 2017. etherscan.io/chart/blocksize
Image
6
80
Now, as noted above, 1 byte of blockspace on one chain is not the same as 1 byte on another chain. There are different levels of security. Bitcoin's security level is for sovereign-resistant digital gold. Newer L1s are guarding things like video game points & don't need as much.
4
95
In summary: - decentralization improves programmability, transparency, exportability, etc - blockspace enables decentralization - blockspace is scarce but rising - and high-blockspace chains & applications are now coming online So: blockspace is to web3 as bandwidth is to web2.
9
268
Decentralization is constrained by blockspace, but blockspace is increasing, so decentralization will be increasing.
17
183