Yes, it is an important question as to exactly *how* to build a decentralized platform that protects free speech against corporate censorship. Web3, BTC-only, or tokenless?
But note that consensus has shifted! A critical mass of the right people now *agree* this is a problem.
Conversation
Replying to
It's a big problem. But doesn't need a blockchain: expensive to full broadcast, brittle bit-level consensus rules. Far simpler designs can replace twitter. Even USENET is pretty good, just make a twitter style client. NoCeM opt in user filters are a great antidote to censorship.
10
6
131
Replying to
As long as we agree on values I am pragmatic about the means to get there. And am funding many different kinds of pro-freedom experiments in all three categories.
Web3 yes, but also pure open source like gun.eco and Bitcoin-only companies like .
Quote Tweet
Funding Announcement
Galoy has raised a $3m seed round to onboard communities and institutions to Bitcoin and Lightning
Led by @craft_ventures. Including @kingswaycapital, @trammelVC, @FulgurVentures, @balajis, @real_vijay, @bradmillscan, @BitcoinerVC and moreShow this thread
values are pretty clear no? censorship is bad, it must stop. the only way to make it stop is actual decentralization, no DAO like roll-back - if there is any lesson here, it should be that groups of nerds trend over time to be little better than groups of politicians.
3
3
38