To give Metamask credit, they do have several issues on Github open discussing issues around globally available web3 instance: - https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-extension/issues/799 … - https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-extension/issues/12 … - https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-extension/issues/537 … -https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-extension/issues/714 …
-
-
I'd also love to see at least an opt-in setting that locks my wallet again after sending a transaction. If a dApp wants to send multiple transactions without unlocking between each, they can use `web3.createBatch`. Metamask handles this well already
Show this thread -
An attack that sent ERC20 tokens would be effective. Unlike moving ETH (where Metamask would say how much ETH you are sending), a token transaction would just display the gas price AFAIK. More likely to trick people if they can't tell what is being sent.
Show this thread -
If you enjoyed this thread on in-browser wallet security, I started a separate thread about community security when running a token sale:https://twitter.com/backus/status/955241954320662528 …
Show this thread -
I turned this thread into a full blog post and also included a few updates! Checkouthttps://blog.hellobloom.io/using-an-in-browser-ethereum-wallet-heres-some-things-you-should-know-e01304b977e3 …
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
We 100% agree, and have only been blocked by basic usability. This last year has been like a constant string of critical issues to deal with, often things that make the entire platform unusable if ignored, which we tend to prioritize higher, for better or worse.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.