"double spend" = publishing 2 transactions to the network, duping someone into thinking they are paid even tho later tx will be invalidated.
-
-
Replying to @backus
I understand that it's not how the term is normally used. That doesn't make my question less valid.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sgrif
Sure just clarifying its not the kind of thing that would cripple the entire network like a double spend would.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @sgrif
Yeah part of why people don't want forks unless it is critical. It is weird to have the value split and require everyone to arbitrage
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
-
Replying to @backus
Oh is that from the Ethereum fork when their... whatever the acronym was got hacked?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sgrif
Yea the DAO. Now classic is $14 and ETH is $200. Market decides what it cares about. Kinda cool
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @backus
Unless you didn't care about the hack, in which case it arbitrarily devalued your currency (block size seems more relevant)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Yea it was certainly controversial. Another interesting link if you are curious. This one BTC vs BTUhttps://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/60qv4k/bitcointalk_user_loaded_signs_a_message_from_an/ …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.