Can someone who understands blockchain shit explain to me how BCC doesn't introduce double-spend possibilities?
-
-
This is literally being able to spend the same money twice. I don't see how that's not a major concern?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Unless the expectation is that a hard fork halves the value of both currencies?
-
Yeah that was my point in https://twitter.com/backus/status/891788392920301568 …. It won't be 50/50 but $ you have in BTC now should now be like 5% in BCC
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Which seems equally concerning
-
Yeah part of why people don't want forks unless it is critical. It is weird to have the value split and require everyone to arbitrage
-
Gotcha. Thank you, that answers my question. :)
-
No problem :) Checkout ETH vs ETC for past example
-
Oh is that from the Ethereum fork when their... whatever the acronym was got hacked?
-
Yea the DAO. Now classic is $14 and ETH is $200. Market decides what it cares about. Kinda cool
-
Unless you didn't care about the hack, in which case it arbitrarily devalued your currency (block size seems more relevant)
-
Yea it was certainly controversial. Another interesting link if you are curious. This one BTC vs BTUhttps://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/60qv4k/bitcointalk_user_loaded_signs_a_message_from_an/ …
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.