The chronology of the "most popular file sharing app" is roughly: Napster Limewire Kazaa eDonkey BitTorrent Reflecting "minimum viable decentralization" over time. Limewire was early, Kazaa more usable. BitTorrent's UX was bad, but won legal long gamehttps://medium.com/@jbackus/minimum-viable-decentralization-d813dcf653fc …
-
Show this thread
-
When decentralizing, half measures bite you in the ass:
Aimster obscured searches and user IPs from its protocol
BitTorrent disowned search and left IPs in the clear
Courts argued Aimster's conduct was "willful blindness." BitTorrent's choices made its position strongerpic.twitter.com/wAsLArkhWT
1 reply 1 retweet 16 likesShow this thread -
Boiling down decentralization movements, we build technology to resist governments installing filters:
Copyright (BitTorrent)
Anti-money laundering (Bitcoin)
Content/communication (Tor)
Legal battles and tech evolution continues until its too hard to install a filter5 replies 12 retweets 45 likesShow this thread -
Once legal pushback enters a decentralized product space, evolutionary pressures start filtering: • Weaker willed torrent search engines closed • BitTorrent's protocol evolved • The Pirate Bay doubles down Expect same when the US government takes on real crypto companies!
1 reply 2 retweets 16 likesShow this thread -
Decentralized technologies mixes legal and objectionable streams together: • Can't separate darknet market traffic from anti-censorship on Tor • BitTorrent protocol is unaware of content You can't throw out the bath water without throwing out the baby, by design.
1 reply 1 retweet 14 likesShow this thread -
In a decentralized product market, recklessness buys early growth. Many companies grew by marketing to pirates. I call BitTorrent an "ugly duckling." It didn't seem like a winner until late in the game. Here's how to spot ugly duck investments:https://medium.com/@jbackus/invest-in-the-ugly-duckling-decentralization-product-market-fit-and-the-law-bea856a6bbad …
1 reply 1 retweet 16 likesShow this thread -
What parts of our tech should we decentralize? How do we know when we're done? I think a lot of people in crypto are struggling with these questions. I think history provides an answer. Find your "minimum viable decentralization"https://medium.com/@jbackus/minimum-viable-decentralization-d813dcf653fc …
1 reply 1 retweet 15 likesShow this thread -
John Backus Retweeted John Backus
This thread focused on decentralization as a legal tactic to be used sparingly, pulling from the history of p2p file sharing. This isn't my only deep dive into p2p history and crypto! Check out my thread on market dynamics, governance, and monetization:https://twitter.com/backus/status/1004471335488122880 …
John Backus added,
2 replies 2 retweets 19 likesShow this thread -
If you enjoyed this thread, my blog post "Resistant protocols: How decentralization evolves" goes into more depth: https://medium.com/@jbackus/resistant-protocols-how-decentralization-evolves-2f9538832ada …
If you don't follow me yet, I tweet regularly about crypto, decentralization, and p2p. Plenty more to come, stay tuned!1 reply 23 retweets 112 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @backus
Hey John, interesting thread.
@threader_app compile & feature it. Thanks@naval for the find.2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
Thanks Vincent!
-
-
Replying to @backus @yesnoornext and
I’ve always been curious why bad UX/UI and decentralization always seem to go hand in hand...
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
Incentive issues (most shared NOTHING, tons of fake files + viruses)
Lots of attempted market mechanisms (from game theory to tokens) to fix incentives
Forking vs governance
Thread 