-
-
-
Yes! This, plus a few other things like starting to hang out with
@rsnous in 2013, convinced me to shift towards this preference
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Also, like all aspects of Myers–Briggs, it puts people at either pole of what is really more like a normal distribution (if it can even be quantified).
-
It’s also a part of big 5 which is actually legit. But either way, like a lot of things in psychology I think it’s useful to measure but also we are probably measuring the effects of things which in this case might be more malleable than we think
-
If people's dating profiles start saying "I'm on the 65th percentile of introversion/extraversion" a la Big Five then I object less :P
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Spot on. It’s really context-dependent. Consider: office, family dinner table, classroom, cocktail party, football field, first date, online games, language class, on the plane, ... Few people can be labeled equally intro/extrovert across all these arenas.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Another problem with the label is that how open a person is often depends much more on the situation they are in than their personality.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Learning about introvert/extrovert spectrums helps people understand how they can best perform in a world that doesn't necessarily conform to their needs. Being an introvert and trying to be more extroverted and labeling it as training is counterproductive and probably harmful.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.