Centralized influence for decentralized projects is good. @VitalikButerin's influence on dev direction is a strength. Leaderless OSS w/ many parties collaborating on improvements becomes design-by-committee. Committees add uncontroversial features, they don't reenvision
-
-
Weak. Nowhere in there do you argue for or against leaderlessness in a cryptocurrency.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.