Music industry wasn't just anti-tech By 2000, they were addicted to inflated revenue: album bundling and illegal price fixing meant you payed $15 for a $10 album to get a $1 song. Even if $1 songs replaced piracy, revenue would fall by ~90%. More for fixed price streaming.
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @backus
i never see anyone saying this... but the albums aren't just some the record industry plot to make more money. musicians want to create albums like writers want to create novels. maybe some chapters are better received than others, but that doesn't negate the point of the novel
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @rogerclark
Yeah that is true and that is how it started, but it was copy paste applied as a template for every artist for revenue reasons. Rap is a good example of it often being forced. Even if artists did all want to work this way, it still wasn't a good match for what consumers wantedpic.twitter.com/SmjVZET2O6
3 replies 1 retweet 5 likes -
Replying to @backus @rogerclark
This is still interesting too though if we take albums as an art form at face value. The music industry did embrace artistic taste/tradition a lot at the expense of listening to what people want. A similar example is talent scouts vs. analyzing demandpic.twitter.com/OTUi3XHZe0
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
“How music got free”https://www.amazon.com/dp/0143109340/ref=cm_sw_r_sms_awdb_t1_ntypBb2EQVHMF …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.