You can view decentralization and cryptography as generalized tools for obeying the letter of the law but not the spirit.
I think the way they can systematically subvert legal precedent will eventually lead to impossibly tough Supreme Court issues.
Thread 
-
-
Decentralization as legal hot potato: • Central search not allowed? Fine, it’s decentralized • You want a client side filter? Fine, BitTorrent doesn’t have a search. Leave that to The Pirate Bay Litigating decentralized products informs how the nextgen should evolve
Show this thread -
Decentralization as digital war on drugs: • Kill Napster? Dozens of replacements ready to step up • Prosecute users? Political suicide. Who likes the DEA or RIAA? • US hate you? Find a willing host. Compare extradition attempts of Escobar to
@KimDotcom and Pirate Bay foundersShow this thread -
How do you censor a permanent decentralized file store? Make a list of illegal files and ask everyone not to seed it? How many free speech radicals do you need to invalidate this system? One? Honestly, I wouldn’t be surprised if the Pirate Bay guys ran a contrarian IPFS node
Show this thread -
Crypto as virtuous finger pointing: Tor is great for anti-censorship in hostile countries. Cryptocurrency is great for Venezuela. Facebook uses BitTorrent to push code updates. Is that how you use them? How far can we take this ambiguity game? I’m not sure there is a limit
Show this thread -
By the way, I’m speaking from an anthropological/historical POV here. I think my takeaways are accurate, but I’m not sure if this is good for us. Crypto and decentralization could polarize us towards anarchy or authoritarianism. True cyberpunk
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.