Decentralized fat protocols out live the companies that create them • Nullsoft launched Gnutella protocol but Limewire/BearShare built the apps we all know. Forks like FrostWire live on eternally • OSS eMule built on eDonkey's networks after they died and even improved on it
-
-
Quote is from MojoNation founder Jim McCoy by the way. Source: https://unenumerated.blogspot.com/2007/06/nanobarter.html?showComment=1181708460000#c2518193502558600657 …
@NickSzabo4 later jokes about the commenter being "anonymous" while using "we" to refer to MojoNation team. Later identifies as Jim McCoy.
Whole thread is a valuable readShow this thread -
MojoNation was a visionary project. In
@zooko's post mortem, he mentions some assumptions about usage that didn't pan out, causing problems. IMO, Jim's comment doesn't reject tokens. Instead, he is acknowledging that the token added too much complexity to an already grand visionpic.twitter.com/NAltFWWXjQ
Show this thread -
Takeaway: Tokenize after you figured out user behavior. MojoNation incorrectly assumed users would leave their PC connected to network all day. People critique some decentralized projects as bolting a token on to an otherwise understood product. This is an interesting reframing
Show this thread -
The teams behind successful decentralized file sharing protocols also created the first client. Tons of people end up competing to be the best app on top of a protocol, but the protocol creators need to lead the way for others. Gnutella was a very important flash in the pan.pic.twitter.com/z5Y8wG3Uxj
Show this thread -
Imagine tokenized BitTorrent where clients negotiate token/GB rate for a transfer • Seeding after dl can buy faster future downloads • Incentive to seed long term and contribute bandwidth • Token bounties for desirable content would incentivize sharing content people want
Show this thread -
There is so much more that I think would follow from tokenized file sharing. I'm planning on writing "What if BitTorrent had a token?" soon
Show this thread -
We should split product/market fit in two when talking about decentralized protocols: • Protocol/market fit: is the protocol powerful+general enough to let apps give users a good experience? • App/consumer fit: does the app optimize how the end user wants to use the protocol?
Show this thread -
The fat protocol layer fundamentally restricts what thin apps can provide. Multiple companies building on the app layer experiment with different product visions in parallel. Their learnings can be fed back into protocol improvements.
Show this thread -
The split between fat protocols and thin apps starts as a weakness and becomes a strength. Until a compelling enough app is built, it is a three legged race to coordinate protocol and app changes. After this MVP is found, you see rapid experimentation and competition
Show this thread -
If you enjoyed this thread, my blog post on the topic goes into way more depth: https://medium.com/@jbackus/fat-protocols-arent-new-42d2c538db41 …
I'll share more on p2p parallels for tokenization, decentralization, scaling, and legality in the future. Stay tuned!Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
70% of Limewire users didn't share ANYTHING. Even more shared nothing of value
Kazaa struggled with fake files and viruses