Et tu, Catkins? @BigMoneyEddy
-
-
Replying to @bAbAHAdAd
Ya went full trad never go full trad Also, that eating disorder shit is real and my cousin had to spend years in therapy to get over it, so I do have a personal opinion about this sorta thing
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @bAbAHAdAd
Your shit junk food take That shit showed a profound ignorance of eating disorders, disorders that are very common in my family And I find your ethical model to parallel with Varg more than anyone
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BigMoneyEddy
That junk food is unhealthy and makes people sick? And I mean, if it's an eating disorder then you wouldn't want to persist in it would you? A disorder is usually something people try to at least remediate. How is my "ethical model" parallel to Varg??
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bAbAHAdAd
It’s more that eating disorders are profoundly limiting and brute forcing through it often isn’t an option. You fall back often into a lot of ‘will to power’ ethics which are deeply reactionary. I’m not an expert on eating disorders, but they affect people I love.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BigMoneyEddy
I don't believe that anyone ought to brute force through any addictions or disorders. If you think that's what I've been saying then you have gravely misinterpreted my intended meanings. Also, the Will to Power isn't reactionary; it's the essence of existence, it is existence.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bAbAHAdAd
Crowley centered will on the individual, so his will to power is, whereas will only exists in the collective and greater assemblage of humanity. Will is an attachment.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Except that pure will, or "True Will," is effectively the same as wu wei... but okay.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.