What part of "non ei qui negat" don't you understand?
-
-
This is how burden of proof in argumentation works.
-
It isn't, but okay.
-
When you go to a debate, both sides present their cases and argue for their positions. They do this because they both have the burden of proof regardless of what position they are taking. Neither side in the debate can claim no burden of proof and it's bad argumentation to do so.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.