On the @EsotericEntityy vs @AnarchoBro96 stuff: it´s pathethic. When we see this discussions between the "left-anarchists" and "ancaps", it´s all about "not reals" and "muh strawmans". Both the ethical justifications for either socialism and capitalism is that...
-
Show this thread
-
one should be entitled to the full value of what he produces. The problem is that this two groups both have different definitions of what constitutes legitimate labour - until both groups, in a discussion, reach an agreement on what constitutes the REAL definition of it, then...
1 reply 0 retweets 1 likeShow this thread -
they will go back and forth in accusing one another of being "statist" or whatever.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 likeShow this thread -
The same happens with the definition of agression. Both sides also have different opinions on it. On Spooner:
@AnarchoBro96 , just because Spooner was part of the 1st Internationale, this does not prove anything. If Spooner was alive, he would totally side with an ancap rather...2 replies 0 retweets 2 likesShow this thread
Why do you consider Woodcock's claim to be baseless?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.