If you want my full philosona, I basically try to synthesize Marx, Kropotkin, and Foucault.
I have no use for Stirner. Ironic racism 
-
Show this thread
-
And I'm talking about the base from what I'm working with. I also try to take an approach that fits the description of metamodernism. I particularly think the ability to acknowledge sometimes the natural state is two conflicting ideas.
2 replies 0 retweets 8 likesShow this thread -
I was working from Marx but I read Conquest of Bread he's much more in line with my views on public ownership. "Worker" is less relevant to Kropotkin.
1 reply 0 retweets 14 likesShow this thread -
Obviously labor is important, but it's less relevant to ownership of the means, and I like that.
1 reply 0 retweets 11 likesShow this thread -
Kropotkin talks about some similar things as Stirner but nothing so ridiculous as the "union of egoists." That's rational self-interest horseshit.
3 replies 0 retweets 9 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @petercoffin
Rational self-interest is a Randian concept, not a Stirnerite concept. Stirner's egoism is not prescriptive, it's descriptive.
1 reply 1 retweet 5 likes -
Replying to @bAbAHAdAd @petercoffin
Everyone is an egoist, according to Stirner, but not everyone is conscious of their egoism and thus they, being possessed by a fixed idea, are alienated from there own uniqueness.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @bAbAHAdAd @petercoffin
This is the basis of all moral institutions, of the State and of Capital, where ideology rules the minds of individuals.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @bAbAHAdAd @petercoffin
Stirner points out that we are the creators of our ideas but when we lose sight of that fact, we end up reifying our ideas and our own creations, rather than serving us, demand our subservience.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @bAbAHAdAd @petercoffin
The antidote to this condition is to accept no fixed idea, to understand that they are mere phantoms of the mind and to make the decision for ourselves how to act. The Union of Egoists is the result of the intercourse of two or more egoists.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
Rather than being a society, which is based upon a principle, a fixed idea, where one is expected to submit to the ideal, the Union of Egoists is a living discourse of willful relations between unique individuals.
-
-
Replying to @bAbAHAdAd @petercoffin
The Union of Egoists has no blueprint, nobody is expected to form one. It's merely what happens when two or more self actualized individuals enter into intercourse.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.