Totally insane.
Since alongside suffering in life is enjoyment, the idea that life must end to cease suffering is absolutely incomplete. If life ends, then so does enjoyment.
-
-
Furthermore, since you don't believe nonhuman animals have the capacity for meaning, they must not have the capacity for higher order suffering either. Since for suffering to be more than mere pain, one must attach meaning to it.
-
Thus, if anything, anti-natalism only makes sense for humans.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
this clearly missed the point: especially in the case of non-human animals, enjoyment is fleeting and suffering is dominant and constant.
-
Wrong. Existence is pure joy. The sorrows are but as shadows, they pass and are done but there is that which remains.
-
i think you're underestimating just now nasty, brutish, and short animal life in the wild is
-
Whatever you say, city kid.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.