-
-
First off the nap is only one principle that ancaps follow,second slavery of any kind is a violation of the nap. please look into anarcho capitalism before judging it. So many people just suck up others opinion when those people didn't even look into it them self's.
-
You need to tell http://libertarianism.org to chill the hell out, then.https://www.libertarianism.org/publications/essays/baby-selling?utm_content=58701637&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter …
-
Then they're not true Libertarians anarcho-capitalism probably the closest you'll ever find to an actual libertarian we follow the core principles of libertarianism while as modern-day Libertarians have completely abandoned them. this will clarifyhttps://youtu.be/uYloEOwKjjA
-
Oh, no. I know Voluntaryism, Libertarianism, Anarcho Capitalism, etc... The difference between your NAP and mine is just that yours is a negative peace, and mine is a positive peace. "Leave each other alone" versus "Lift each other up."
-
The non-aggression principle simply Advocates that the initiation of force cannot be defended and if the initiation of force cannot be defended then obviously self-defense can be defended.
-
How can you square that away with capitalism when you can literally kill someone by denying them food and shelter? In that sense, any financial transaction under capitalism is an expression of force.
-
How is simply refusing to give away your property to someone voluntarily a threat to someone's life? The act of killing someone over that would be the initiation of force.
-
Because property ownership is a completely batshit concept when you try to take it back to first principles. Who had the right to sell the land in the first place? Somebody at some point got it for free and then extorted money out of someone else to let them be there.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
