"Is turning a robot off murder?" I don't know, is butchering a slave murder? It mostly seems dependent on their ability to make people feel bad about it through hard or soft power.
lol no it isn't I'm a moral nihilist. Both an amoralist and an immoralist. Animal agriculture is intimately tied to the patriarchal capitalist superstructure, both historically and ideologically, and as such consumption of meat is fundamentally heteronormative.
-
-
If you are truly a moral Nihilist then you'd have no problem with patriarchal capitalism as it's just one form of culture that humans are capable of creating. I'm a cannibal feminist. Many mammals will eat their young if they don't think they can feed them, this includes apes.
-
From a practical standpoint, it's the most effective way for the mother to control her own reproduction. If she wants children she can always get pregnant again, and the new ones will be fundamentally identical to the old ones as infants. Only grown individuals are unique.
-
And if there is no reason not to eat your own immature young, then there is no reason not to eat literally any other animal that you wouldn't raise like a human child, and no reason not to murder any human who isn't a friend, and then do anything you want to their body/property.
-
I'm only opposed to Patriarchal capitalism because I think that women can come up with less self destructive forms of exploitation. (All existence is essentially exploitative because in a universe with entropy, energy has to come from somewhere and waste has to go somewhere else)
-
Animal agriculture is among the most destructive forms of exploitation under this foul capitalist system. It's no mistake that most vegans are women.
-
Of course it's not a mistake, Patriarchy has sold women a false form of compassion to alienate them from their true nature as destructive creators. And even Plant agriculture is still worse than hunting and gathering, which often involves murdering intelligent megafauna.
-
Animals like Buffalo and Elephants are probably closer to person-hood than chickens and cows which have been bread into subservience. And many cultures that harm the environment much less than us murder the fuck out of them, women included.
-
Even in societies when women are not hunters or warriors, they are the main instigators of aggressive behavior in males. Patriarchy was invented by men to control male aggression for the sake of plant based agriculture.
- 6 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
-
Yes. Manliness is the basis of meat consumption. Have you never attended a BBQ?
-
So Kali isn't drinking the blood of her husband and or enemies? Only men are ever carnivorous? I think that's a pretty patriarchal assumption as it is.
-
Humans aren't a carnivorous species. It's sociopathic violence, which is a necessary component of masculinity, as masculinity has been historically defined and currently functions, that drives humans to consume meat.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.