No, wrong. While erotica might still exist, albeit likely in a form that transcends the implicit alienation of sexualization, pornography will be impossible under communism.
Content vs. context. While the context of the content does not necessarily define the content, the content of the context defines itself. A piece of art can be sold and still be art, yet when intercourse is sold it's not lovemaking but whoredom.
-
-
but it's not being sold, this is our point
-
omg it is being sold though even if it's not obvious otherwise you're just mislabeling actual erotic art as porn look at the power dynamic and the intention and you have your determination as to whether or not we're talking about porn or erotica
-
what to you call material that isn't produced for artistic purposes but isn't commercialized then?
surely that would exist under socialism -
It's called trash and it would only exist in the lower substratum of a socialist society, eventually to be phased out as the transition to full communism is commenced.
-
Hmmm... sounds kinda classist to me












-
In case you didn't know we don't like Tankies in these parts
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
E X C E P T I T I S N T B E I N G S O L D.
-
Yes it is.
-
what about porn is more innately commercial than any other form of media? tbh this argument kinda just sounds like slut shaming with a left veneer
-
Porn is created under the context of a power imbalance and with the intention of gaining a profit, whether that profit is monetary or made for cultural capital ("free") or a mix.
-
Cultural capit... Fucking E X S C U S E me?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.