No, wrong. While erotica might still exist, albeit likely in a form that transcends the implicit alienation of sexualization, pornography will be impossible under communism.
It's not "free" though and is still produced for commercial purposes even if the commercialization isn't explicit or obvious.
-
-
free, non-commercialized porn exists
-
No it doesn't.
-
Are you entirely unfamiliar with Cam girls/boys and Amateur porn?
-
Still commercial. Either hosted on a site with ads and/or done as a way to entice others to pay for private shows, like "free samples" Free porn is free like social media is free. It's not.
-
So almost no communist or anarchist literature or discourse is valid because a good portion of it is published and for sale or occurs on a site with ads? This argument is very silly tbh.
-
Content vs. context. While the context of the content does not necessarily define the content, the content of the context defines itself. A piece of art can be sold and still be art, yet when intercourse is sold it's not lovemaking but whoredom.
-
but it's not being sold, this is our point
-
omg it is being sold though even if it's not obvious otherwise you're just mislabeling actual erotic art as porn look at the power dynamic and the intention and you have your determination as to whether or not we're talking about porn or erotica
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Replicating capitalist relations in the bedroom does not make devoid of its innate commercialism even if it's done by "individuals".
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.