i'm not using value relativism. and i'm not trying to 'refute' moral nihilism. i didn't make an argument against it.
-
-
no. you're misusing the fact/value distinction. i'm saying the ought property exists as a state of affairs.
-
i'm invoking ethical non-naturalism, not ethical naturalism.
-
which *itself* uses the fact/value distinction to argue against ethical naturalism. so that doesn't really work here.
-
You're talking in circles. Simply the fact that morality exists as a state of affairs in no way justifies morality
-
you didn't ask me to "justify morality" - whatever that would entail. i was responding to,
-
"where do you get your morals from?" as you can clearly see in the thread.
-
Basically morality is self delusion.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.