But if someone explicitly says that they are amoral, then it is just a preference.
-
-
Understanding how people talk about moral statements has no actual bearing.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bAbAHAdAd @worthy248
declaring that you're amoral doesn't make it so.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
especially when that declaration always comes with a load of moral sentiments as is par for the course with nihilists
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @gabrielamadej @worthy248
"moral sentiments" basically any subjective value is a "moral sentiment" it seems.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Do you realize that if you are trying to refute moral nihilists with value relativism, then you are self refuting?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bAbAHAdAd @worthy248
i'm not using value relativism. and i'm not trying to 'refute' moral nihilism. i didn't make an argument against it.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
making reference to 'moral sentiments' assumes nothing about the meta-ethical framework i hold behind it
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
i'm saying that amoralists don't exist and that, further, most statements of amoralism comes loaded with moralism
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Sacrilege!
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.