People who preach non-violence most do so till violence is at their doorstep; then it's violence or death; virtually all choose the former.
-
-
Violence you approve of is still violence.
-
I don't consider protective use of force the same as violence since it lacks the element of aggression.
-
Violence without aggression is still violence.
-
The WHO defines violence as "intentional use of physical force or power, threatened or actual, ...
-
...against oneself, another person, or against a group or community, ...
-
...which either results in or has a high likelihood of resulting ...
-
...in injury, death, psychological harm, maldevelopment, or deprivation"
-
The protective use of force does not fall under this definition.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
That means you agree with Malcolm X and not MLK.
-
I agree with both MLK and Malcolm X.
-
You can't agree with both; they had different views on violence.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.