that just serves my point even better.
-
-
Replying to @gabrielamadej @Immolationism
Not really. Your hand waving isn't persuasive. You basically derive morality from magick spells.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bAbAHAdAd @Immolationism
you didn't ask me to 'derive' morality from anything.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
as such, i didn't. i responded to your points.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @gabrielamadej @Immolationism
"Ethics is secular" is false on many fronts.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bAbAHAdAd @Immolationism
we're not getting anywhere just responding to each other with platitudes
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @gabrielamadej @Immolationism
All I'm saying is you can't ethics w/o conceiving morality.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Neither God nor the lack thereof are sufficient to derive morality.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
We understand morality as a question of values and of evaluation.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
The problem arises from plurality of values which we understand as subjective in character.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Ethics, the study and application of morality, can be either secular or not.
-
-
Just as philosophy in general can be either secular or not.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.