Utilizing violence to achieve a goal is authoritarian. Is that bad?
-
-
Replying to @bAbAHAdAd
No one on earth would say that violence as a means is always authoritarian except for conflationists.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @rechelon @bAbAHAdAd
The problem with tankies isn't the use of any violence, the problem is the enshrinement of centralized coercion.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @rechelon
So? Your solution is to violently suppress tankies?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bAbAHAdAd
Yep. Be prepared and shoot them first this time rather than waiting to be inevitably betrayed / rounded up.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @rechelon
And you still deny your authoritarianism? This seems like bloodthirst to me.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @rechelon
Your Wolfowitz Doctrine strategy isn't "resistance", it's just preemptive violence. It's an attempt to dominate.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bAbAHAdAd
So you think preemptive violence against nazi say isn't resistance but "an attempt to dominate"? Come on.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @rechelon
I won't say that it's bad to utilize preemptive violence on Nazis, especially in a time of war.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
But I also will not dehumanize anyone based upon their ideological viewpoint, however violent and destructive.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.