But bosses, landlords, etc. are in fact authoritarian. I'm saying it would be better for people to have control.
Not necessity alone and you'd work less and receive more in a socialist society.
-
-
You'd work less?How do you achieve quality with less people working? And work isn't just necessity today either
-
Quality would be achieved if there is no profit motive because things would be built to last instead of to break.
-
The motive for profit is the incentive for innovation. Open a book. Not one written by a jealous wannabe.
-
Necessity is the mother of invention, not profit motive. Profit motive = flooded with useless shit that breaks.
-
I said innovation, silly pants. And, if one saw no personal gain from his invention, he wasted his time and wealth.
-
Lots of really brilliant people work to invent things simply because they love creating.
-
In the end it's usually the capitalists that exploit the inventors.
-
Well, I have to go back to class. Here's a little something to help cure your idiocy and jealousypic.twitter.com/R7ADBb7ZsY
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
You don't believe that people should own the product of their labour?
-
If I worked at a home improvement store and the workers owned the products, who pays for the means of production?
-
Everyone. But you should be able to put up with the cost of maintaining the means of production and create wealth
-
Just like a normal business does... Except instead of making a boss fat off your labour, you keep the wealth.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.