She didn't say we should have socialist police for people who post porn and that's not something I believe either, so I don't know where you're getting this idea from.
In a post-patriarchal society where women and bodies are no longer objectified, who would still be producing porn, which is meant as an article of consumption?
-
-
Are you telling me that people won’t make erotica or sexual imagery? That’s like saying that drugs and alcohol will be banned because they too are consumer products, along with say, art.... (cont)
-
Considering a post patriarchal society hasn’t been achieved, it’s stupid to assume what will and won’t be “Consumed” or created. If people chose to be or not to be sex workers that’s their choice, not mine. If people want to make pornographic videos...
-
Draw hentai etc. that’s their choice, not mine. Come what may post revolution, I still doubt that people are going to stop being horny on main if you follow
-
I think unalienated sexuality would look extremely different from how sexuality currently manifests itself. I doubt that people would want to continue to reproduce objectifying imagery, including self-objectification.
-
Well, we’ll just have to wait and see what happens. So long as it’s done out of free will, and not coercion, I’m fine with it.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I don't know, would we still eat bread after we would have freed the baker? Would people still make content on something like youtube? To suggest people wouldn't watch or make porn after capitalism is just so dumb it's through the roof.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.