You do realise you can believe in the abolition of work, while also defending sex workers?https://twitter.com/offtogulagnow/status/1058670396264902657 …
Fully autonomous and liberated human beings are not subject to sexual commodification, are not sexual objects, and therefore do not participate in a transactional economy of sex. If there's money involved, there's exploitation, regardless of the industry.
-
-
Which, again, can be applied for any work industry. However, outlawing porn outright, as this person suggests, or people who wish to voluntarily do sex work (without the coercion that capitalism breeds), under socialism isn’t something that socialists ought to embrace.
-
Where is she saying we ought to outlaw sex work? Point to it.
-
-
I don't see her saying that we ought to outlaw sex work here.
-
>under socialism there would be no pornography
-
Yes, and? I imagine a world devoid of capitalism and patriarchy would by default not have a porn industry.
-
For fucks sake, how many times do I have to tell you lot? Porn=/= porn industry
-
In a post-patriarchal society where women and bodies are no longer objectified, who would still be producing porn, which is meant as an article of consumption?
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.