If you see someone trying to harm a child, are you just going to not intervene because "violence is wrong"? How fucking ridiculous of a pious fraud do you have to be to be a pacifist?
Conceivably, sure, depending on the situation. But if that's what it takes to act in the first place, you're lost. The likelihood of such an ideal situation is narrow. Sometimes, to achieve the least harm, one must act with swift and decisive force against oppressive violence.
-
-
[cracking knuckles] Let's fight some child harmers!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.