THIS. repeat to yourself until that bad ontology clears.https://twitter.com/shanekilkelly/status/1045742860291768320 …
It's not supernatural. I'm not a dualist. It's not contrary to the laws of physics nor to any laws of economics to posit consciousness as ubiquitous. Capital exists in the mind just as much as it is physically bound.
-
-
You say you are nondualist then you oppose “mind” the physical? What is mind for you if not the same as the physical? You have a wonky as F metaphysics friend. Actual gnosis leads to the rejection of all the categories in favour of the abundant suchness of being. You confused yo.
-
no let’s parse out which image is based on methodological observation and is falsifiable and which one isn’t, shall we?pic.twitter.com/9i23chjD6d
-
What observes? Scientism isn't a good argument for a materialist ontology. The fact that physical laws have been discovered does not imply that the physical is necessarily the ontological substrate of existence.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
this guy has; no idea what; ideas really do;
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.