RT if women don't have penises.pic.twitter.com/x7ZwwSowxy
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Disorientation and alienation are facts of our relation to the world, not of the content of the world. Accepting the fact that existence is extremely complex, often in ways that defy definition, helps to assuage the dizziness.
Yes and by inflating meaning of words you are making the relation more difficult. In fact you are making your world less complex by diluting meaning of the word other than use new or different word.
I'm not diluting the meaning. It's about understanding the core concept which allows for anomalies to exist within it. Your humans example was a perfect illustration of this. A human with a tail is still a human, after all.
Exactly. If you talk about humans there is no implicit tail included. The meaning is not tied to anomalies. If you find out someone has a tail you are surprised, its weird, definetly not normal. Same for women with penises.
I didn't say it was normal, only that it's permissible inasmuch as it exists. Just as a human with a tail is unusual but still human, so to a woman with a penis may be unusual but is still a woman.
Thats not comparable because sex organs are the most important visible gender defining characteristics - not only for humans but also animals, plants etc. Its not like having an extra tail.
Functioning sex organs is what defines your gender.
Not really. If I chop your dick and balls off, you're still a man. You'd be a dickless eunuch of a man, but still a man nonetheless.
Of course. Because i used to have penis from the birth. I wouldnt become a woman if i get fake vagina after choping my penis of.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.