RT if women don't have penises.pic.twitter.com/x7ZwwSowxy
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
That's a little stale. A mind open to novelty experiences a richer world. Aside from transgenderism, there are also biological conditions which can cause human females to have penises. It's pretty stupid to go around enforcing conformity when nature does no such thing.
Im not enforcing conformity at all. I just want to know if "woman" has penis or not before i start to date her. Its pretty important for me you know)
Why? Isn't it better to form a deeper connection with someone before going straight into sex? If your primary concern is just sex, why even date? Why not just join a sex club, or hire a sex worker, or masturbate?
So according to your view im not supposed to have preferences when it comes to sex? In fact its your concept of "intimate connection" whats superficial, "about sex" and lacks any deeper meaning. It is the ability to create new life and start a family what makes sex meaningful.
So your interest is breeding. Well, not every woman is fertile either. Are you going to ask a woman: "Do you have a penis? If not, are you fertile and willing to breed?" Making babies is not what makes a family. You'll end up with a broken home if you don't take love seriously.
This is why it's not appropriate to be concerned about sex when forming a relationship with someone who may be a potential mate. The proper course of action is through mature courtship; meaning you get to know the person first before taking it to the level of sex.
Become friends first and then when it comes to wanting to become more intimate, then you worry about the penis thing. If you find you're not sexually compatible, either remain friends or part ways without undue rancour.
Also, if you fall in love with someone and the feeling is mutual, and you desire to start a family but you are unable to breed for whatever reason (and there could be many), then there are other ways to have kids such as surrogacy or adoption.
Again. It depends on what you want. If you are dating with intention to find someone to eventually have kids with (most people do - at least implicitly), having matching sex organs is number one priority. If you find out woman has a penis the relationship is over immediately.
Nature does many things that you dont automatically accept because "nature does it" - thats pretty stupid argument :)
All I'm saying is that nature disagrees with your definition of "woman." Nature loves to produce so-called "freaks" and the idea that the categories of sex and gender can be neatly defined orients us away from full comprehension of human sexuality.
So are freaks and statistical anomalies representative? I bet nature sometimes produces humans with two heads or a tail. Does it mean humans are creatures with tail?
It means that humans sometimes have tails or two heads. And no scientist would disagree with me here.
Yes and thats not a good reason to put humans with tails to human anatomy books to represent the human form. Thats my whole point.
A human with a tail is still human and as such would be representative of an aspect of human biology. There are no idealized forms; only aggregates and tendencies.
That's the thing about evolution... life is constantly in flux; constantly changing shape.
This world doesnt seem richer to me but disorienting and alienating. Im for using different words for different fenomenons. How exactly is diluting the meaning of words making world richer?
Disorientation and alienation are facts of our relation to the world, not of the content of the world. Accepting the fact that existence is extremely complex, often in ways that defy definition, helps to assuage the dizziness.
Yes and by inflating meaning of words you are making the relation more difficult. In fact you are making your world less complex by diluting meaning of the word other than use new or different word.
I'm not diluting the meaning. It's about understanding the core concept which allows for anomalies to exist within it. Your humans example was a perfect illustration of this. A human with a tail is still a human, after all.
Exactly. If you talk about humans there is no implicit tail included. The meaning is not tied to anomalies. If you find out someone has a tail you are surprised, its weird, definetly not normal. Same for women with penises.
I didn't say it was normal, only that it's permissible inasmuch as it exists. Just as a human with a tail is unusual but still human, so to a woman with a penis may be unusual but is still a woman.
Thats not comparable because sex organs are the most important visible gender defining characteristics - not only for humans but also animals, plants etc. Its not like having an extra tail.
Functioning sex organs is what defines your gender.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.