lol. honestly perplexed someone can such a restrictive & impoverished understanding of: a. mass transit & b. urban economics/sociology/geography/policy Trolling doesn’t work if you over-sell it, yknow? This lib sea lion trash isn’t even very good smdh.https://twitter.com/palecur/status/1012148802700992513 …
-
-
Replying to @yungneocon
There ain't no train where I live and the nearest bus stop from the cottage is 1km away.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
-
Replying to @bAbAHAdAd
¯\_(ツ)_/¯ the contribution to CO2, pollution, accidents, racism, public health, sprawl, infrastructure costs, poverty, inequality, inaccessibility, alienation, exploitation, congestion, & exclusion outweighs any one individuals interests.
2 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @yungneocon
Building mass transit in rural areas doesn't seem like a good idea.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bAbAHAdAd
The costs of driving would be less in rural areas anyway, though. The issue is: a. the existence of suburbs at all b. automobiles in the city c. massive highways The limited necessary use of cars outside of that context is fine with me—just don’t impose costs on state/ecology.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
Suburbs should be banned too
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.