Also there’s good research on how to make people NOT be that ideology anymore. And guess what empathy isn’t the way. So even if I conceded your staticness rebuttal, it’d still be non sequitur, bc eliciting that dynamism requires a different modality entirely.
"Self concept"? The concept of the self is not the self. The Tao that can be told is not the eternal Tao; The name that can be named is not the eternal name. Ontologically, I consider information as prior. From your arguments, I surmise that you're ontologically a materialist.
-
-
At the level of a realist monism, the difference between information & materialism is basically moot—which is why there are scientific materialists who subscribe to informational physics’. That said, that has very little do with my view on the self. ^__^
-
Informational physics? You mean digital physics? Digital ontology and informational ontology define information differently, if I'm not mistaken. Matter and mind are products of information according to informational ontology.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.