If and only if the "anarcho" part is legitimate, then yes, it would result in the collapse of actual capitalism. The problem is that when you must set up enforcers of property relations, you end up with de facto statism. Great for property owners, enslavement for everyone else.
So why would it be in my self-interest to respect the property of capitalists since their holding of property deprives me of my own? Murray Rothbard was a twisted moralist who rationalized the selling of children as property and of police violence against the homeless.
-
-
If rights are inherent then they shouldn't need to be enforced as they would simply be there. In a natural system, it is not possible to "go against nature" since every aspect of the system is nature. In actuality rights are not inherent, they are socially constructed.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
Right — is a wheel in the head, put there by a spook; power — that am I myself, I am the powerful one and owner of power.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.